Scenarios requiring frequent branch changes Finally I describe how git worktree allows you to check out multiple branches at once, so you can work on two branches simultaneously, without impacting each other. I then present some possible ways to avoid having to change branch. But remember – there is still much to discover in GIT.In this post I describe some scenarios in which you need to change git branches frequently and why this can sometimes be annoying. I hope that after reading this article you will find yourself better with working on the branches. Now we are creating a completely new commit with changes – one that doesn’t show all our work in progress and various quick fix commits. Git merge -squash feature_branch git commit -m “New correct name of our changes” We can always use amend to rewrite the last commit and add missing files or changes.īut what if we’ve already deployed the changes to a remote repository? How to hide a history of ten following commits on a feature branch that only have the fix message, before we upload the change to the main branch? We can use git merge: These things happen – and usually lead to a fix commit. Let the programmer who never forgets to add a file to the commit cast the first stone. Because reverting git rebase in much harder that reverting git merge. One thing to remember: The golden rule of rebasing is to never use it on public branches.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |